Legal Opinion

State v. Gabryschak

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 26, 1996No. 35018-8-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kennedy, A.C.J.

Scott Gabryschak appeals his convictions of felony harassment and third degree malicious mischief, contending, among other things, that the trial court improperly denied him a voluntary intoxication instruction. At trial, State’s witnesses testified that Gabry-schak was intoxicated on the night of his arrest. Gabry-schak did not testify and did not call witnesses. Contrary to the trial court’s apparent understanding, a defendant need not call witnesses or testify in order to meet the burden of showing evidence of intoxication and its effects, in that such evidence can be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CoatesWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. GriffinWashington Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. State Of Washington v. Darrell D. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State v. KrugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API