Legal Opinion

Price v. S.S. Fuller, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1982No. 5004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIMOND, Senior Justice.

Fuller leased some land to Edna Cox. She assigned the leases to Price. 1 In October 1978 Fuller commenced an action against Price (a) to recover the léased premises, and (b) for unpaid rent, taxes and damages. Judgment in favor of Fuller was entered against Price in October 1979. Price has appealed.

I. VALIDITY OF LEASES

Most of the leased land was not covered by any recorded subdivision plat. Price argues that granting summary judgment in favor of Fuller and against Price was improper because the leases of unplatted land were illegal and therefore voidable.

There…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Marriott Financial Services, Inc. v. Capitol Funds, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Totem Marine Tug & Barge, Inc. v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wright v. VickaryousAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alaska Statebank v. FaircoAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Waterkist Corporation, Debtor. City of Valdez, Alaska v. Waterkist CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Klosterman v. Hickel Investment Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Smith v. ClearyAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sunset Fuel & Engineering Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API