Legal Opinion

People v. Sutherland

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1922No. Crim. No. 906PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of recording and registering bets as that offense is defined in subdivision 4 of section 337a of the Penal Code. He appeals from the judgment of imprisonment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

As ground upon which to base his claim for a reversal of the judgment and order, appellant insists that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a conviction; that the district attorney was guilty of misconduct in his argument to the jury; and that the court erred in admitting the testimony of two police officers who identified the various…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CarrollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. People v. ReifenstuhlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. WarnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. State v. ClarkeNevada Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API