Legal Opinion

R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 3, 2004No. 02-P-716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.

After rescript in R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J&S Insulation, Inc., 435 Mass. 66 (2001) (Granger I),2 Heafitz & Sullivan, LLP (H&S or the law firm), filed a notice of attorney’s lien for fees pursuant to G. L. c. 221, § 50. Their client, J&S Insulation, Inc. (J&S or the client), moved to dissolve the lien; the law firm moved to enforce and compel payment of fees; and a judge of the Superior Court entered orders enforcing the lien and denying the motion to dissolve. The judge specifically ordered J&S to pay H&S in the amount of $128,174. J&S appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

1.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. J & S Insulation, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Manganaro Drywall, Inc. v. White Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Cambridge Trust Co. v. Hanify & King Professional Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Daynard v. Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, P.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rockland Trust Co. v. LangoneMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
  2. Sunrise Equipment & Excavation, Inc. v. Construction Management & Builders, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API