Legal Opinion

Manganaro Drywall, Inc. v. White Construction Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 2, 1977PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment against them as principal and surety respectively in a proceeding brought by the plaintiff subcontractor under G. L. c. 149, § 29, to collect the balance due it on a public works project. This appeal concerns only the question whether the judge’s allowance of the claimant’s legal fees was proper. The defendants argue that that portion of G. L. c. 149, § 29, set forth in the margin,2 which permits a successful claimant to recover reasonable legal fees, is unconstitutional. They claim that they are denied equal protection of the laws because § 29 grants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Goldfarb v. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Meeker & Co. v. Lehigh Valley RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Floors, Inc. v. B. G. Danis of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Borne v. Haverhill Golf & Country Club, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API