Legal Opinion

Cambridge Trust Co. v. Hanify & King Professional Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 21, 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

A judge in the Superior Court granted summary judgment to the defendant law firm, Hanify & King Professional Corporation (H & K), in connection with a controversy between H & K and the plaintiffs, Cambridge Trust Company *473and Cambridge On-Line Services, Inc. (collectively, CTC), over a contingent fee agreement. The judgment allowed H & K to be paid attorney’s fees under the contingent fee agreement on the entire amount (less certain deductions) of an arbitrator’s award which assessed both damages under G. L. c. 93A, and attorney’s fees, on CTC’s claims against NCR Corporation (NCR). CTC…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. International Travel Arrangers, Inc. v. Western Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ruth M. Sargeant v. Alexander E. Sharp, IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Malonis v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Siegel v. Berkshire Life InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  3. Heldreth v. RahimianWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Saggese v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. Rubin v. MurrayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API