Legal Opinion

In re Harp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this court in 1966 and maintains an office in New Paltz, Ulster County.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, by petition of charges and specifications dated December 5, 1990, accuses respondent of professional neglect and conversion of client funds. Respondent has admitted to the charges and specifications.

Charge I, in 24 specifications, accuses respondent of conversion of client funds in violation of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (4), (5) and (7) and DR 9-102 (A) and (B). Each of the 24 specifications cites a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re McDowellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. In re MichaelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ChariffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. In re RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re HarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API