Legal Opinion

In re Chariff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1977 and currently practices law in Binghamton.

By petition dated May 27, 1994, the Committee on Professional Standards accused respondent of converting client funds (charge I), commingling personal funds with clients’ funds (charge II), issuing checks which were returned for insufficient funds (charge III), borrowing funds from a client without taking appropriate steps to protect the client’s interest (charge IV), failing to comply with a rule of this Court (charge V), attempting to mislead and deceive petitioner (charge VI),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re BartholomewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re WaltersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. In re HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Fengling LiuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re OrseckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. In re SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re ChariffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API