In re Harp

By decision dated May 3, 1991, respondent was suspended by this court for a period of six months, effective June 3, 1991 (see, Matter of Harp, 173 AD2d 957). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s reinstatement. Accordingly, respondent will be reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Levine,…