Legal Opinion

Melnick v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 1, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02630Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARTIN and BETH MELNICK, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) Case No. 19-2630-JWL-KGG ) TAMKO BUILDING PRODUCTS, ) INC., ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________) MEMORANDUM & ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL Now before the Court is Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Compel.” (Doc. 232.) Having reviewed the submissions of the parties, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as more fully set forth herein. BACKGROUND In this putative class action, three sets of Plaintiffs have brought the present lawsuit against Defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Avedon Engineering, Inc. v. SeatexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Sonnino v. University of Kansas Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  3. Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Swackhammer v. Sprint Corp. PCSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  5. Williams v. Board of County Commissioners of the Unified Government of Wyandotte CountyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API