Legal Opinion

Jones v. Bostick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1912No. 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Jackson ■County Court; W. T. McConnell, Judge. Action by J. R. Bostick against M. T. Jones and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff, sued the plaintiffs in error, M. T. Jones and S. A. Hall, as defendants, in replevin for the recovery of certain chattels by virtue of a mortgage executed by said defendants to secure certain notes. The notes were given as consideration for the purchase of a certain acreage of cotton, corn, and millet. The defendants answered, admitting the execution of the mortgage and notes, but alleged certain fraudulent representations on the part of the plaintiff, in that they represented said acreage to be in excess of what it actually was, and also as to what such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broyles Et Ux. v. McInteerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Luger Furniture Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stockyards State Bank v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Bank of Buffalo v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Mutual Refining Co. v. Union Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API