Bank of Buffalo v. Crouch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Harper Coun. ty; W. C. Crolw, Judge. Replevin by the Bank of Buffalo against R. L. Crouch. Judgment for plaintiff, allowing certain amounts on defendant’s counterclaim, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
This is an action in replevin commenced by the Bank of Buffalo against R. L. 'Crouch, for the possession of personal property, under .and by virtue of a chattel mortgage given fo secure the payment of a promissory note in the sum .of $618, with interest. The-.answer .of the de-íéhdant was a general denial .'.with counterclaim for alleged usurious* interest charged by plaintiff and paid by defendant. .There 'was. trial to a jury and verdict and judgment for plaintiff for the possession of the property in controversy, which fixed the amount of plaintiff’s interest in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Butler v. StinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Stockyards State Bank v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Smith Premier Typewriter Co. v. Grace, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.