Legal Opinion
State v. Clark
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 22, 1965No. 39652PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an original proceeding upon defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He is at liberty on bond fixed by a committing magis trate for his appearance in the district court. He contends that the appearance bond has placed him under illegal restraint and seeks to test the asserted illegality by the writ of habeas corpus.
From an examination of the record it appears that defendant was charged by criminal complaint in the municipal court of Fridley, Anoka County, with violation of Minn. St. 609.52, subd. 2(6), (L. 1963, c. 753) which denounces the offense of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Holm v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Brian Keith Schnagl, a/k/a Brian Keith Schnagel, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Danielsen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Peyton v. NordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968