Legal Opinion

Clark v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2010No. S174229PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Under California’s unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.), plaintiffs, who are senior citizens, sued an insurance company, alleging deceptive business practices relating to the purchase and sale of annuity contracts. Plaintiffs sought a monetary award, and they asserted that statutory law entitled them to a trebling of the award.

Plaintiffs rely on Civil Code section 3345, which provides that in an action brought by senior citizens to redress unfair competition, a trier of fact may award up to three times the amount imposed as “a fine, or a civil penalty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Safeway, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Sterling Park, L.P. v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API