Legal Opinion

Graybill v. Swift & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1988No. 16520PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

Claimant sustained an industrial accident and injury while employed by respondent Swift & Company. The doctors diagnosed claimant as having a back strain, accompanied by complaints of back pain and right and left thigh pain. No objective orthopedic or neurological changes were found by any of the examining physicians. At the time of the hearing claimant was engaged in employment which provided him a salary equal to that which he earned prior to his *294accident, although claimant claimed to be under constant pain from the accident.

The claimant’s treating physician rated claimant as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Clark Hereford RanchIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Smith v. Payette CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davaz v. Priest River Glass Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Funes v. AARDEMA DAIRYIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Urry v. Walker & Fox Masonry ContractorsIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McCabe v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ball v. Daw Forest Products Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API