Legal Opinion

Valmont Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 7, 1993No. 91-1377, 91-1378PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the District of Nebraska determined that Reinke Manufacturing Company infringed Valmont Industries’ U.S. Patent No. Re. 31,838 (’838 patent). Valmont Indus. v. Reinke Mfg. Co., 14 USPQ2d 1374, 1990 WL 67881 (D.Neb.1990). Because the district court incorrectly found infringement of claims containing means-plus-function limitations, this court reverses.

BACKGROUND

On April 9, 1974, U.S. Patent No. 3,802,-627 (the ’627 patent) issued on an invention of David Seckler and David Porat, assignors to Valmont’s predecessor-in-interest. The ’627…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Carroll Touch, Inc. v. Electro Mechanical Systems, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API