Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Coulton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the Hon. H. A. Sharpe.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The present suit was brought under the act “to define the liabilities of the employers of workmen,” approved February 12, 1885. — Sess. Acts, 115; Code of 1886, §§ 2590 etseq. The plaintiff was serving the defendant corporation in the capacity of brakeman on one of its trains, and complains that, while performing his duty, and in obedience to a proper signal therefor, “in attempting to apply one of the brakes on said train, as it was his duty to do, by reason of the weak and defective condition of said brake, and of the appliances thereto belonging, he was violently thrown down, upon or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Ala. G. S. Railroad v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. DicksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Smith v. CauseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1856

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Highland Avenue & Belt Railroad v. DusenberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Boriss v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API