Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Birmingham. Tried before the lion. H. A. Sharpe.

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The action is brought by the plaintiff, Mrs. Johnston, with whom her husband is joined as co-plaintiff, claiming damages of the defendant railroad corporation, for the refusal of the conductor to stop the train and put her off at a station to which she had paid her fare as a regular passenger on the road. The gravamen of the action, as averred in the complaint, is, that the defendant “willfully refused to stop” the train of cars at Alice Station, the point of plaintiff’s destination, and carried her several hundred yards beyond the customary stopping place, where she was compelled to alight,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. South & North Ala. Railroad v. McLendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Wilkinson v. SearcySupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Lienkauf & Strauss v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MarkeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. RoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Stringer v. Alabama Mineral RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API