Legal Opinion
American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 18, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Heretofore and on August 26, 1932, acting as Senior Circuit Judge of the seeond circuit in the above-entitled cause E 70 — 364, brought by the American Brake Shoe & Foundry Company as complainant, duly pending in equity in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, I appointed Messrs. Victor J. Dowling and Thomas E. Murray, Jr., as temporary receivers of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, and by order entered on September 29th, after due notice and full opportunity to be heard by all parties in interest, I appointed them as permanent receivers.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Washington-Southern Navigation Co. v. Baltimore & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Thorn v. BrowneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Butz v. Society National Bank of the Miami Valley (In re Clark)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1933
- Stewart v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020