Ex Parte United States
Supreme Court of the United States
PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. The facts, which involve the construction of the Expedition Act of 1903 and the question of whether certain provisions of the Judicial Code of 1911 conflict therewith, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White
The matter before us concerns the execution of the decree in United States v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, 224 U. S. 383. That case, which involved violations of the Sherman Anti-trust Act, was commenced in the Circuit Court of the-United States for the Eastern District of Missouri, was there decided by four circuit judges in consequence of the filing by the Attorney General of the United States of the certificate provided for by the act of February 11, 1903 commonly known as the Expedition Act, c. 544, 32 Stat. 823. While the case was here pending, the Judicial Code of March…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Petri v. F. E. Creelman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
3Cited by28 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Terminal Railroad Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Donald F. Bettenhausen and Bernice A. BettenhausenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.