Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 30, 1990No. ACMR 8800137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of sodomy, indecent assault, and taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of sixteen years. He was also convicted, pursuant to his plea of guilty, of assault and battery. The foregoing offenses were in violation of Articles 125, 128, and 134 Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 928, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, and reduction to the grade of Private El.

*771I

Appellant,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. FinkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. Jimmy N. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. ArmstrongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API