United States v. Armstrong
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
DeFORD, Senior Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial of sodomy, indecent assault, and taking indecent liberties with a child under the age of sixteen years. He was also convicted, pursuant to his plea of guilty, of assault and battery. The foregoing offenses were in violation of Articles 125, 128, and 134 Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925, 928, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence included a dishonorable discharge, confinement for ten years, and reduction to the grade of Private El.
*771I
Appellant,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Chiarella v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TateoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. ArmstrongUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. FinkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- Jimmy N. Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. ArmstrongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991