Legal Opinion

Klock Produce Co. v. Hartson

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 2, 1914No. 1848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Raw. Action by the Klock Produce Company against Millard T. Hartson, as Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Washington. On motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

Verdict was recovered by plaintiff against the defendant, who, as collector of internal revenue, under threats of distraint and over plaintiff's protest, wrongfully compelled the payment of certain taxes and penalties for the manufacture and sale of butter, claimed by the defendant to be adulterated. Appeal was taken by the plaintiff to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and, upon the failure of that officer to direct the refunding of the money so exacted, this suit was brought.

Interest is included in the verdict. The defendant now moves for a new trial; the main…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Erskine v. Van ArsdaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Redfield v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Schell v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huntley v. Southern Oregon Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Worth Bros. Co. v. LedererDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API