Wight v. Rohlffs
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
The above-entitled cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury and judgment entered in favor of defendant. Thereafter plaintiff moved for and was granted a new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of evidence. Defendant appealed, and plaintiff now moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the action was one in which defendant was not entitled as a matter of right to a trial by jury, and that consequently, under section 963 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order granting the new trial is not appealable.
Subdivision 2 of said code section, as amended in 1933, provides: “An…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. JudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Bettencourt v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Cauhape v. Security Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Woolsey v. WoolseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Nason v. ShinjoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wight v. RohlffsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941