Legal Opinion
Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 2010No. 125PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Cipabick, J.
In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whether respondent’s exercise of its power of eminent domain to acquire petitioners’ property for the development of a new Columbia University campus was supported by a sufficient public use, benefit or purpose (see NY Const, art I, § 7 [a]; EDPL 207 [C] [4]). We answer this question in the affirmative and conclude, pursuant to our recent holding in Matter of Goldstein v New York State Urban Dev. Corp. (13 NY3d 511 [2009]), that the Empire State Development Corporation’s (ESDC) findings of blight and determination…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Krieger v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 2013
- Held v. State of New York Workers' Compensation BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- State v. Spencer D.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Tuck-It-Away, Inc. v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Zutt v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.