Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Doctor

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 8, 1956No. 6772Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partQuinn, Chief Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

The majority make much of the fact that this Court cannot reweigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses who contradict each other. This limitation on our power of review, however, does not preclude us from determining that a witness’ testimony is inherently unbelieveable. United States v Mardis, 6 USCMA 624, 20 CMR 340; United States v Chinn, 6 USCMA 327, 20 CMR 43. Moreover, it is our responsibility under the Uniform Code of Military Justice to examine the evidence and determine whether it is sufficient to establish the accused’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. HatchettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. PadillaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. GomesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. McBrideUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API