Rumbolz v. Wipf

HOMEYER, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment which denied him recovery for damages to his automobile resulting from an intersec-tional collision with an automobile driven by the defendant. The complaint alleged that defendant's negligence was the proximate cause of the accident. Defendant filed a general denial. The matter was tried to the court without a jury. The *329court found the defendant was negligent as a matter of law,1 but such negligence was not the proximate cause of the accident and that the sole proximate cause of the collision was the negligence of one Jerry Mahrt who was…