Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 12, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Neal F. Eisenberg and Kim Yen Eisenberg appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated February 17, 1999, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing their first, second, and eighth affirmative defenses alleging usury, and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting those branches of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schanz v. SotscheckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. New York Mortgage Co. v. GarfinkleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Stanley Weisz, P. C. Retirement Plan v. NCHD Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. New York Mortgage Co. v. GarfinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weisel v. PischelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  2. Gowan v. Gardi (In re Gardi)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  3. Shapiro v. Rockville Country ClubNew York Supreme Court, Nassau County · 2004
  4. Barker v. RokoszDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API