Legal Opinion
Peterson Et Ux v. Peterson Et Ux
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1956No. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, motion to correct notice of appeal allowed January 11, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
The defendants-respondents move for an order to dismiss this appeal, and the plaintiffs-appellants move for an order granting them the privilege of making a correction in the notice of appeal. The motion to dismiss is based upon these contentions:
“* * * The Plaintiffs-Appellant have failed to file with the Clerk of this Court a transcript as required by the provisions of 19.070 O.R.S. within the time provided by law and that this appeal appears to have been abandoned by said Plaintiffs-Appellant.”
The motion to amend and thereby correct the notice of appeal is predicated upon the fact that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martin v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
- Pond v. Jantzen Knitting MillsOregon Supreme Court · 1947
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Freeman Printing Co. v. LuebkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Unemployment Compensation Commission v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re the Estate of Cheong ChinnHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Peterson Et Ux v. Peterson Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956