Legal Opinion

Peterson Et Ux v. Peterson Et Ux

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1956No. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, motion to correct notice of appeal allowed January 11, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 Or. 131 (1956)

292 P.2d 130

300 P.2d 443

PETERSON ET UX

v.

PETERSON ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Submitted on briefs July 25, 1956.

Affirmed July 31, 1956.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, motion to correct notice of appeal allowed January 11, 1956.

Goldstein, Galton, Galton & Popick, Portland, for respondents.

Frank L. Whitaker, Portland, for appellants.

MOTION TO CORRECT NOTICE OF APPEAL ALLOWED.

MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPEAL DENIED.

ROSSMAN, J.

The defendants-respondents move for an order to dismiss this appeal, and the plaintiffs-appellants move for an order granting them the privilege of making a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. HarrisonOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Chance v. GrahamOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Nelson v. Hampton Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Neppach v. NorvalOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hunter v. HunterOregon Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API