Legal Opinion

Blunt v. Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 11, 1918No. 8366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Superior Court. Pottawatomie County; Leander 6. Pitman, J udge. Action by Alice Blunt against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company and William Barnes. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, motion for new trial sustained, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PRYOR, C.

This action was brought by Alice Blunt, plaintiff, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company and William Barnes, in the superior court of Pottawatomie county, for the recovery of damages for the wrongful death of her husband. Arthur Blunt.

The petition of plaintiff alleges that she is the widow of Arthur Blunt, and that on or about the 20th day of November, 1913, the deceased, Arthur Blunt, discovered that a blind mare belonging to him had wandered upon the trades of the defendant company about one-quarter of a mile east of the depot of said company in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schaub v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. CutterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. LukertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. HairelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Cumberland Operating Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. National Tank Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Sample v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API