Legal Opinion

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Hairel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1915No. 3542PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Músico gee -County; R. P. De Graffmreid, Judge. Action by Charley Hairel and another against the Muskogee Electric Traction Company, a corporation, and another. Judgment for plaintiffs against the defendant named, and it brings error.

Read the full summary

Error from District Court, Músico gee -County; R. P. De Graffmreid, Judge. Action by Charley Hairel and another against the Muskogee Electric Traction Company, a corporation, and another. Judgment for plaintiffs against the defendant named, and it brings error. This is an action for damages, instituted by Charley Hairel and Netta Hairel, defendants in error, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against the Muskogee Electric Traction Company, a corporation, and James G. Lyons, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, for the wrongful killing of a minor child of plaintiffs-Plaintiffs…

1Opinion of the Court

COLLIER, C.

(after stating the facts as above). Defendant urges many assignments of error; but for a proper review of this ease, it is thought necessary to consider only the errors alleged in giving said instructions numbered 4 and 10, and in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Under the provisions of the contract entered into by and between the contractor and defendant, giving defendant the right to discharge such employees of the contractor as might not meet with the approval of defendant, upon the grounds stated in the provisions of the contract hereinbefore set out, and the provisions,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co. v. MotesenbockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Williams v. South & North Ala. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Chas. T. Derr Construction Co. v. GelruthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Tunnel Mining and Leasing Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Wilson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API