Bank of Mendocino v. Baker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This is an action in ejectment. A day or two before the trial of the cause, the defendants offered in writing to allow the plaintiff to take judgment for all the land sued for except that described in paragraph 6 of the answer. This seems to have been declined, and the result of the trial was, that the plaintiff obtained judgment for all the land except that set out in said paragraph, and for costs. From that judgment, and an order denying a new trial, the plaintiff has appealed.
Under the facts as found by the court, the plaintiff was defeated in its efforts to recover the land…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- In re the Estate of GarraudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
3Cited by18 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gill v. MoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- MacDonald v. Reich & Lievre, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Dennis v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.