Legal Opinion

Miller v. Struck Const. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

MILLIKEN, Justice.

Appellant instituted this action-to recover damages for injuries which he sustained as a result of stepping into an uncovered hole in a sidewalk constructed by appellee. At the conclusion of all the evidence the trial court sustained appellee’s motion for a peremptory instruction and directed the jury to return a verdict accordingly, and the propriety of that instruction is the question on this appeál.

Appellee, as general contractor for the new Courier-Journal Building in Louisville, constructed the public sidewalk along the Sixth Street side of that structure. Before the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Vale v. BonnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  3. Hull Ex Rel. Hull v. GilliozSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. Brown v. City of CraigSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  5. Majestic Theater Company v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API