Legal Opinion

Hull Ex Rel. Hull v. Gillioz

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by a minor plaintiff (her guardian has been substituted for next friend), for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff had judgment for $12,500, and defendant has appealed.

Plaintiff was injured by the fall of a heavy iron beam when she was playing with other children on defendant's premises. Plaintiff's case is based on the attractive nuisance doctrine. The sole question on this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to make such a case. Therefore, the facts hereinafter stated are those shown by the evidence most favorable to plaintiff. Defendant was a contractor engaged…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. United Zinc & Chemical Co. v. BrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Nagel v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. Kelly v. BenasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Cushman MotorsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  2. Cooper Ex Rel. Cooper v. FinkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. White v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Oberkramer v. City of EllisvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API