Legal Opinion

Goss v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1932Published

1Opinion

On the Merits

(12 (2d) 1006)

BROWN, J.

Over and over again we have asserted that the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law should be liberally construed and fairly applied, to the end that its humane purposes might be carried out. It was also the manifest purpose of the Compensation Law that compensation should be adjusted from time to time, as the disability increased or diminished: Farrin v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 104 Or. 452 (205 P. 984); Chebot v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 106 Or. 660 (212 P. 792). Moreover, section 49-1827, Oregon Code 1930, provides a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Farrin v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Meaney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Monahan v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API