Anderson v. Section 11, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Corbett, J
Section 11, Inc., was formed to develop a section of land (approximately 640 acres) which it leased from Northern Pacific Railway (now Burlington Northern) for a term of 99 years. The lease permitted sublease of recreational homesites. Fifty acres were platted into a development called Vikingdal, consisting of 101 circular, noncontiguous lots. Only 29 of the lots were leased; plaintiffs are sublessees.
This action arose when Section 11, Inc., demanded from plaintiffs a substantial increase in lease payments. Section 11, Inc., had encountered financial difficulty and sought to pass on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morgan v. BurksWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Rena-Ware Distributors, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. StarkWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Sepich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Corp v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.