Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Section 11, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 9, 1981No. 7952-2-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Corbett, J

Section 11, Inc., was formed to develop a section of land (approximately 640 acres) which it leased from Northern Pacific Railway (now Burlington Northern) for a term of 99 years. The lease permitted sublease of recreational homesites. Fifty acres were platted into a development called Vikingdal, consisting of 101 circular, noncontiguous lots. Only 29 of the lots were leased; plaintiffs are sublessees.

This action arose when Section 11, Inc., demanded from plaintiffs a substantial increase in lease payments. Section 11, Inc., had encountered financial difficulty and sought to pass on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morgan v. BurksWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rena-Ware Distributors, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  3. J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. StarkWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Sepich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Corp v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API