Legal Opinion

State v. Schaeffer

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1990No. C9-89-1109PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant Oscar Christopher Schaeffer was convicted of first degree criminal sexual conduct by a jury in Kandiyohi County District Court. Appellant claims he was deprived of his right to a fair trial because the trial court: (1) admitted the results of his polygraph test into evidence; and (2) admitted his coerced confession into evidence. We find that the admission of his confession was proper, but based on the improper admission of the fact that appellant had taken and failed a polygraph test, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

On April 21, 1988, M.K., the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wyrick v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. KolanderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. State v. SchaefferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API