Legal Opinion

Bannen v. Bannen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 1985No. 0489PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

The family court granted appellant Gudrun G. A. Bannen a divorce from respondent William J. Bannen, together with alimony, the marital residence, and attorney’s fees. This appeal presents three issues: did the court err in (1) holding Mrs. Bannen does not have an equitable interest in Dr. Bannen’s professional association, (2) ruling Mrs. Bannen is not qualified to testify as to the value of the business’ property, and (3) determining alimony. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

In appeals from family courts we have jurisdiction to find the facts in accordance with our…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Cudd v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Woodside v. WoodsideCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Casey v. CaseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  5. Berry v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API