Legal Opinion
Baldwin Rubber Co. v. Paine & Williams Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1938No. 7726PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellee was the owner of Turner patent" No. 1,715,523 for floor coverings for automobiles and the like and Vrooman patent No. 1,715,525 for a similar purpose. Claim'3 of the Turner patent was for a floor covering or the like, flexible throughout comprising a loosely-compacted fibrous base, with a layer of fabric stitched thereto, and an upper wearing surface layer of flexible vulcanized rubber.
Claim 4 of the Vrooman patent was for a covering for floors and the like comprising a resilient, fibrous base and an upper wearing layer of rubber, said upper layer extending…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. CramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Paine & Williams Co. v. Baldwin Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Stubnitz-Greene Spring Corp. v. Fort Pitt Bedding Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Refrigeration Engineering v. York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. v. Sel-O-Rak Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Automatic Paper Machinery Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.