Legal Opinion
Refrigeration Engineering v. York Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1948No. 11642PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
York Corporation (herein called plaintiff) brought this action in the district court for a declaratory judgment that the McAdam patent, No. 2,219,393, issued October 29, 1940, was invalid and for an injunction restraining Refrigeration Engineering, Inc. (herein called defendant), owner of the patent, from bringing or prosecuting any action charging plaintiff with infringing the patent. Defendant filed an answer which contained a counter-claim (improperly called a cross-complaint) charging that plaintiff had infringed the patent and praying for an injunction against such…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Pointer v. Six Wheel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Pacific Contact Laboratories, Inc. v. Solex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Bernard H. Stauffer v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.