Legal Opinion

Burcham v. Franke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 4, 2014No. CV110550; A150449PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Petitioner was convicted of several crimes arising from an incident in which he provided alcohol to a 16-year-old girl and, while she was intoxicated, sexually assaulted her. We affirmed petitioner’s convictions on direct appeal. Petitioner then sought post-conviction relief on the ground that his trial counsel was inadequate. The post-conviction court accepted the petition and reversed petitioner’s judgment of conviction in its entirety. The state appeals, assigning error to that ruling. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. BACKGROUND

The facts pertinent on appeal are undisputed. In…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Behrle v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Richardson v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Wilson v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Brumwell v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. Decker v. SundquistCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API