Legal Opinion

ROSARIO v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 18, 2024No. 3:23-cv-20854Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ARAMIS D ROSARIO, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-20854 (RK) (JTQ) Vv. PINI MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S OPINION OFFICE, et al., Defendants. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon its sua sponte screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) of Plaintiff Aramis Rosario’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6, “FAC”) and Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7, “SAC’), as well as a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 26) filed by Defendants the Middlesex County Prosecutor’s Office (the “MCPO”), Assistant…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API