Legal Opinion
Holman v. OLSTEN CORP., OLSTEN HEALTH CARE
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 10, 1986No. CX-86-102PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Relator appeals from the Commissioner’s determination that she lost eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits. We reverse.
FACTS
Lynne Holman was employed by the Ha-zelden Chemical Dependency Center as a prevention consultant from August 1984 until April 1985, at a salary of $20,700 per year. Holman has a masters degree in public health and several years’ experience in her field. Due to a serious illness, Holman resigned her position at Hazelden in April. She applied for and began receiving $195 per week in unemployment compensation benefits. See Minn.Stat. §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Employers' Overload Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Krumm v. R. A. Nadeau Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Sticka v. Holiday Village SouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Berzac v. Marsden Building Maintenance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Glende v. Commissioner of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newland v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- Welch v. Iowa Department of Employment Services, Job Service DivisionCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1988
- Valenty v. Medical Concepts Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Mbong v. New Horizons NursingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- A-Plus Demonstrations, Inc. v. Commissioner of Jobs & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.