Legal Opinion
Blonsky v. Allstate Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1985PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
The issue presented in this motion is whether an insurance broker owes a continuing duty to advise, guide and direct an insured’s coverage.
Defendant Samuel Feldman Brokerage Corp. (Feldman) moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 dismissing the complaint and cross claims against it.
Feldman had been plaintiff’s insurance broker from 1952 till 1980. Sometime prior to March 1980, Feldman obtained primary automobile insurance coverage from the Aetna Insurance Co. (Aetna) with a combined single limit of $300,000. Feldman also obtained an excess…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Pulka v. EdelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Additional January 1979 Grand Jury of Albany Supreme Court v. DoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sosnow v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Sosnow v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nelson v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Farmers Ins. Co., Inc. v. McCarthyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sadler v. Loomis Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Chaim v. BenedictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Rogers v. UrbankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.