Seals v. Henry Ford Hospital
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P.J.
The issue common to these appeals is the trial judge’s holding that the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq., is unconstitutional.
In each case, the trial judge held that the act violated the single-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. The arrest record and polygraph provisions of the act were found to be nongermane to its object. In each case, the trial judge held that provisions of a statute found to violate the single-object clause are not severable.
None of these cases involves the arrest record or polygraph provisions of the act. All of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. McMurchyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Gregory v. Litton Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jenkins v. Southeastern Michigan Chapter, American Red CrossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- King v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cavalier Manufacturing Co. v. Employers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.