Legal Opinion

Seals v. Henry Ford Hospital

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1983No. Docket 57454, 57609, 60359, 60360, 60510, 60511PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, P.J.

The issue common to these appeals is the trial judge’s holding that the Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq., is unconstitutional.

In each case, the trial judge held that the act violated the single-object clause of Const 1963, art 4, § 24. The arrest record and polygraph provisions of the act were found to be nongermane to its object. In each case, the trial judge held that provisions of a statute found to violate the single-object clause are not severable.

None of these cases involves the arrest record or polygraph provisions of the act. All of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Follette v. BurgosSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. McMurchyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gregory v. Litton Systems, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Southeastern Michigan Chapter, American Red CrossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. King v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Mooahesh v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Cavalier Manufacturing Co. v. Employers InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API