Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. State of Arizona, Department of Game and Fish, Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation v. State of Washington and Ralph Larson, Individually and as Director of the State of Washington Department of Game
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 1981No. 79-4294PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
649 F.2d 1274
WHITE MOUNTAIN APACHE TRIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF ARIZONA, DEPARTMENT OF GAME AND FISH, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF the COLVILLE INDIAN RESERVATION,
Plaintiff-Appellees,
v.
STATE OF WASHINGTON and Ralph Larson, individually and as
Director of the State of Washington Department of
Game, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 78-3427, 79-4294.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued Feb. 13, 1980.*
Submitted June 19, 1980.
Decided April 6, 1981.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc June 22, 1981.
Kathleen A. Rihr, Whitewater, Ariz., argued…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tohono O'Odham Nation v. SchwartzDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1993
- Burns Harbor Fish Co., Inc. v. RalstonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
- Yakima Indian Nation v. WhitesideDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1985
- Yakima Indian Nation v. WhitesideDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1985
- Lower Brule Sioux Tribe v. Southn DakotaDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.