Legal Opinion
Bellemare v. Clermont
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 18, 2007No. 06-P-1047PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
Alleging that the defendant, Gertrude A. Clermont, was an “owner” of certain residential premises in Lowell, the plaintiff, Michael Bellemare, asserted claims against her and others for childhood lead paint poisoning allegedly contracted while he was under the age of six and a resident at the property. See G. L. c. 111, § 199. A judge of the Housing Court allowed the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that, “[i]n the unique circumstances of this case, it could not be found that [the *567defendant] was an ‘owner’ of the property within the meaning of the Childhood Lead Poisoning…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Johnston v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Attorney General v. School Committee of EssexMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Underwood v. RismanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Morrison v. LennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Berman v. SandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Management Nominees, Inc., a Belize corporation and Alderney Investments, LLC, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Edyta Skowronska, individually and on behalf of her minor children, RS and DSWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- In re Colbran, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Ciampa v. Bank of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Kneer v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of NorfolkMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Greenleaf Arms Realty Trust I, LLC v. New Boston Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2013