Underwood v. Risman
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The defendant, Robert Risman, appeals from a judgment in which a Superior Court judge ruled that failure to disclose to childless prospective tenants the likelihood of the presence of lead-based paint in a residential dwelling was a wilful and knowing act of deception proscribed by G. L. c. 93A, § 2 (1990 ed.). 3 The judge ruled that this conduct was causally related to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff which were caused by the ingestion of lead-based paint particles. The plaintiff was awarded damages in the amount of $2,212,925, which included trebled damages, attorney’s fees, costs,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Tomasella v. The Hershey Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Greenery Rehabilitation Group, Inc. v. AntaramianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Augat, Inc. v. Aegis, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.