Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Risman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1993PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

The defendant, Robert Risman, appeals from a judgment in which a Superior Court judge ruled that failure to disclose to childless prospective tenants the likelihood of the presence of lead-based paint in a residential dwelling was a wilful and knowing act of deception proscribed by G. L. c. 93A, § 2 (1990 ed.). 3 The judge ruled that this conduct was causally related to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff which were caused by the ingestion of lead-based paint particles. The plaintiff was awarded damages in the amount of $2,212,925, which included trebled damages, attorney’s fees, costs,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Tomasella v. The Hershey Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  3. Greenery Rehabilitation Group, Inc. v. AntaramianMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  4. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  5. Augat, Inc. v. Aegis, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API