Legal Opinion

Amerman v. LAKELAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1973No. 43517PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendants Walter and Theodore Anderson appeal from a judgment determining and awarding attorneys’ fees for legal services rendered to them by plaintiffs. The single issue raised is whether the evidence sustains the trial court’s factual determination that $13,600 rather than $37,000, the amount claimed by plaintiffs, represents the reasonable value of the legal services.

Our review of the evidence, including plaintiffs’ answers to interrogatories received as an exhibit during trial, convinces us that there is ample evidentiary support for the court’s determination. Since it is fundamental…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Obraske v. WoodySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Dolf v. SchlactenhaufenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  2. Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Zurich Reinsurance (UK) Ltd. v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Ryan v. Bigos Properties Ex Rel. BigosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API