Legal Opinion
James Nunley v. Dept. of Justice
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 14, 2005No. 04-1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the requirements of the due process clause with respect to forfeiture notices sent to a prisoner. James Nunley filed a pro se complaint against the Department of Justice, the “Drug Enforcement Agency,” Officer Hal-facre (a member of a DEA task force), and unknown federal narcotics agents, charging that the federal government violated his due process rights when it administratively forfeited some of his property (ie., declared the property forfeited without a court order, see 19 U.S.C. §§ 1607-1609; 21 U.S.C. § 881) while he was incarcerated. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Charles Richard Stone v. Rick Harry Anita Schlank Deborah Konieska Rhonda Heskin Amy Anderson Lori Parkos Jim LindCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Watson Coatings, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Nunley v. Department Of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Matthew TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Cobb v. MadlockDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Gary L. Holsinger v. Renee K. HanrahanUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.